Sibling articles under this feature previously restated requirements in inconsistent forms.
Design model
Platform spec article
Design model
Spec standingStandard
-
This feature hub owns normative MUST/SHOULD contract text for Parser and AST contracts.
Context
Decision
This feature hub owns normative MUST/SHOULD contract text. Sibling articles must not redefine hub requirements and should link here for authority.
Consequences
Contract changes start on the hub or in linked ADRs, then propagate to articles and implementation anchors.
Verification anchors
site/website/src/content/docs/platform-spec/compiler/front-end/parser-and-ast-contracts/index.mdxarticle bundle under the same feature directory.
-
Platform-spec text supersedes informal crate comments for Parser and AST contracts.
Context
Implementation crates accumulated informal notes that diverged from published contracts.
Decision
Normative platform-spec prose and ADRs under this feature supersede informal comments in implementation crates until explicitly migrated into spec text.
Consequences
Engineers file spec/ADR updates when behavior changes; crate comments are non-authoritative for conformance arguments.
Verification anchors
compiler/crates/beskid_analysis/src/beskid.pestcompiler/crates/beskid_analysis/src/parsingcompiler/crates/beskid_analysis/src/syntax/items
-
Multiple parser entrypoints caused span drift.
Context
Multiple parser entrypoints caused span drift.
Decision
beskid.pestandbeskid_analysis::parsingare the authoritative parse surface; AST contracts derive spans from this pipeline only.Consequences
Alternate parsers must not ship without an ADR and conformance fixtures.
Verification anchors
compiler/crates/beskid_analysis/src/beskid.pestcompiler/crates/beskid_analysis/src/parsing.
- Contracts and edge cases Non-negotiable parser contracts and common edge-case handling rules.
- Design model Mental model for how the front-end parser and syntax model are organized.
- Examples Concrete examples that show parser contracts in daily compiler work.
- FAQ and troubleshooting Common parser and syntax questions with practical debugging guidance.
- Flow and algorithm Step-by-step parse flow from source text to syntax structures.
- Verification and traceability How to verify parser behavior and trace docs back to source.
0 revisions (git unavailable at build; counts may be empty)
No commits recorded for this path.
Full tree: run pnpm verify:platform-spec-layout (writes src/generated/platform-spec-layout-report.json).
The front-end is split into three layers:
- Grammar layer (
beskid.pest): token and production definitions. - Parsing layer (
src/parsing): traversal helpers that map parse trees into typed syntax nodes. - Syntax layer (
src/syntax/items,src/syntax/types): stable Rust structs/enums consumed by resolver, analysis, docs, and formatter paths.
For newcomers, the practical rule is simple: if a language construct changes, update grammar and syntax together, then confirm semantic passes still read the resulting nodes as expected.
extend type in the module AST
Section titled “extend type in the module AST”extend type is a top-level module item for type extension (see extend type). Parser responsibilities:
- Discovery order —
Program.itemspreserves source order; mod host discovery walks items deterministically. - Merge semantics — Generated
extend typecontributions merge with hand-authored extensions under host validation before semantic analysis. - Legacy removal —
MetaDefinitionAST nodes must be removed from parser output.
HIR lowering for extend type is documented in AST and HIR shape contract.