Skip to content
Beskid The Beskid Book

Beskid

Jump to a Beskid service

Beskid

Jump to a Beskid service

1.7 Why are we making this so hard?

Most software is business records with lipstick—and the industry sells cathedrals to serve them.

Why are we making this so hard?

Strip the keynote slides. Most Enterprise “platforms” are glorified Excel tables with a nice UI.

What marketing saysWhat you maintain
Digital transformationCRUD + workflows
AI-powered insightsSQL + a chart
Event-sourced meshstatus column + outbox table
MicroservicesOne service per tab on the admin panel
Platform teamKubernetes YAML and a broken staging env

marketing

The hard part is rarely algorithms. It is:

  • Permissions nobody documented
  • State machines spread across three handlers
  • Reports that must match finance’s spreadsheet (the real source of truth)
  • Integrations with vendors who treat webhooks as optional

Because complexity sells:

  • Consultancies bill by transformation.
  • Vendors bill by seat and tier.
  • Hiring managers signal maturity with buzzwords.
  • Developers protect craft pride with patterns (see 1.3 SOLID, DRY, and DDD).

Sales pitch — complexity sells

Quick realization times do not favor deleting layers. They favor adding another service so this quarter’s roadmap turns green.

Theatre: eighteen interfaces to save one row.

Shipping: one transaction, one audit log, one email, go home.

That would be great — ship the row

Beskid is not anti-structure. It is anti-structure you cannot see in the build artifact. If your architecture only exists in PowerPoint, it is not architecture—it is fan fiction.

  • Make common business software expressible without importing a religion.
  • Prefer compile-time clarity over runtime mystery.
  • Keep tooling fast enough that CI and local dev stay honest.

If your problem is genuinely novel—finite element solvers, game engines, codecs—use Rust, C++, or Zig and be happy. Beskid is not auditioning for that job.

Noted — use the right tool

Next: 1.8 Conclusion.